
‘Craving for conversations about living better and longer'
Biological age captures physiological deterioration better than chronological age and can potentially be influenced by lifestyle changes.
Think of biological age as your body's true odometer, measuring wear and tear rather than just time. When your biological age exceeds your chronological age, it suggests accelerated aging—potentially indicating higher risk for age-related diseases. Conversely, a biological age lower than your chronological age might reflect better health status and function than expected for your years.
The range of biological age acceleration values in studies is striking, with some people showing biological ages up to 20 years younger or older than their chronological age. This wide range highlights the significant impact that genetics, environment, and lifestyle choices can have on aging processes.
Jordan Bortz and colleagues at Humanity Inc. emphasize that measuring biological age offers two key benefits: evaluating the effectiveness of aging interventions and making better predictions of age-related conditions, including mortality risk. Essentially, biological age gives you a more accurate picture of your health than simply counting candles on your birthday cake.
The concept isn't just academic, biological age estimates can detect differences even in young, healthy individuals before disease or visible signs of accelerated aging appear. This early detection creates opportunities for intervention that might help extend both lifespan and healthspan—the healthy, functional years of life.
Over the past few decades, researchers have developed various methods to estimate biological age, moving from basic clinical measurements to sophisticated molecular testing and AI-driven analyses:
The journey to understanding your biological age often begins in your doctor's office with fundamental measurements that provide important clues about how your body is aging compared to population averages:
Blood tests represent perhaps the most accessible and cost-effective approach to biological age assessment. Recent research from the UK Biobank involving over 300,000 participants identified key blood biomarkers strongly associated with aging and mortality risk.
When scientists measure inflammation markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6, they're essentially checking how much "repair work" your body is conducting. Think of inflammation as your body's construction crew, some activity is normal and necessary, but too many crews working overtime can indicate accelerated aging.
Fasting glucose, insulin levels, and HbA1c provide insights into your metabolic age. These measurements are like checking how well your body processes its fuel – efficient energy management typically indicates younger biological age. When these levels are elevated, it's similar to an engine running too rich, potentially causing premature wear.
Among the most important biomarkers identified were:
According to Bortz and colleagues' research, these markers collectively can predict mortality risk with impressive accuracy. Their Elastic-Net derived Cox model using 25 selected biomarkers outperformed previous models like PhenoAge, providing an 11% relative increase in predictive value.
Your cholesterol panel, including HDL, LDL, and triglycerides, offers clues about cardiovascular aging. These fats are like the oil in your body's machinery – the right balance keeps everything running smoothly, while imbalances can accelerate wear and tear.
Recent advances in science have unveiled more sophisticated ways to measure biological age at the molecular level:
DNA methylation patterns—chemical modifications to DNA that can change with age—have emerged as powerful biological age predictors. These "epigenetic clocks" like Horvath's clock, GrimAge, and PhenoAge analyze specific sites in DNA where methylation typically changes with age.
Imagine your genome as a vast library of books – methylation patterns are like bookmarks and notes added over time, indicating which chapters (genes) should be read or ignored. Scientists can analyze these patterns to determine how well your cellular library is being maintained.
Telomeres, the protective caps at chromosome ends, naturally shorten with cell division and age. Measuring their length is like checking the remaining length of a burning candle – it can indicate how much cellular lifespan remains.
While telomere length was one of the first proposed biomarkers of aging, recent research suggests its predictive power may be less robust than once thought. As Vaiserman and Krasnienkov note, "TL per se can only allow a rough estimate of aging rate and can hardly be regarded as a clinically important risk marker for age-related pathologies and mortality."
Glycans are complex sugar molecules that decorate the surface of our cells. Their patterns change as we age, making them valuable biological age markers. Think of glycans as cellular ID badges that become worn and modified over time – their state can reveal how your cells are aging.
Beyond molecular markers, how well your body performs certain tasks can indicate your biological age:
VO2 max testing measures your body's maximum oxygen utilization during exercise. This is like measuring your engine's peak performance – a higher VO2 max typically indicates a younger biological age. The test involves exercising on a treadmill or stationary bike while wearing monitoring equipment.
Though simple, grip strength is a surprisingly good indicator of biological age and overall health. It's like testing the structural integrity of a building – weak grip strength often correlates with accelerated aging and increased health risks.
Our brains also provide important clues about biological age. Tests of memory, processing speed, and problem-solving abilities can reveal how well your cognitive functions are maintaining themselves compared to age-matched peers.
Newer approaches incorporate brain imaging, retinal scans, and physiological tests like walking speed and lung function measurements. These methods assess functional decline that occurs with aging.
Modern technology has enabled more sophisticated ways to determine biological age:
Artificial intelligence algorithms can now analyze combinations of biomarkers, physical measurements, and even facial photographs to estimate biological age. While these systems can process vast amounts of data to identify aging patterns, it's crucial to note their limitations.
Facial analysis, in particular, can be misleading due to cosmetic procedures, skincare treatments, facial fillers, or other aesthetic interventions. These modifications can mask true biological age markers, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments. Therefore, AI-based age estimation is most reliable when it primarily focuses on internal biomarkers and functional measurements rather than external appearances.
Many longevity clinics now offer comprehensive biological age assessments that combine multiple testing methods. These panels provide a more complete picture of how different body systems are aging, much like getting a multi-point inspection of a complex machine.
The most promising developments may combine multiple markers for greater accuracy. Researchers found that using common clinical assay panels alongside imputation methods maintained good predictive accuracy even with incomplete data. This means reliable biological age estimation could soon become more widely available in routine healthcare.
The field continues to evolve rapidly. Emerging technologies like continuous glucose monitoring, sleep tracking, and real-time stress measurement are providing new windows into how our bodies age. Scientists are also developing more precise biomarkers and better ways to interpret their complex interactions.
While advanced biological age testing is still evolving, several options are already available to health-conscious individuals:
Standard blood tests: Even routine blood panels that assess kidney function, inflammation, blood sugar control, and liver function can provide insights into biological aging processes.
Composite biomarker testing: Several companies now offer tests specifically designed to estimate biological age using blood biomarkers. Look for those that include cystatin C and the other key markers identified in recent research.
DNA methylation testing: Commercial epigenetic clock tests are available, though these tend to be more expensive than blood-based tests.
Home monitoring: While not comprehensive biological age tests, devices that track metrics like heart rate variability, sleep quality, and recovery can provide useful data about physiological functioning.
The real value of biological age testing lies not in the number itself but in the insights it provides for improving health. Research suggests several strategies that may slow or even reverse aspects of biological aging:
Biological age testing represents a promising frontier in personalized healthcare. As research continues to refine these tools, they offer an increasingly valuable window into our health beyond what the calendar tells us.
The most encouraging aspect is that biological age appears to be malleable. Unlike chronological age, biological age can potentially move in both directions, giving us all greater agency in shaping our health trajectories.
Understanding your biological age test results requires context and professional guidance. Results should be viewed as a snapshot of your current health status and a guide for intervention rather than a definitive prediction of lifespan. Remember that biological age tests are tools for optimization rather than crystal balls. They can help identify areas where interventions might be most beneficial and track the effectiveness of lifestyle changes or treatments over time.
By understanding and tracking your biological age, you gain powerful insights that can guide lifestyle choices and potentially identify health issues before they manifest as disease, putting you in control of not just how long you might live, but how well.
Citations: Linpei Jia, Weiguang Zhang & Xiangmei Chen (2017) Common methods of biological age estimation, Clinical Interventions in Aging, , 759-772, DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S134921
Vaiserman A and Krasnienkov D (2021) Telomere Length as a Marker of Biological Age: State-of-the-Art, Open Issues, and Future Perspectives. Front. Genet. 11:630186. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.630186
Bortz, J., Guariglia, A., Klaric, L. et al. Biological age estimation using circulating blood biomarkers. Commun Biol 6, 1089 (2023).Link
The information presented here is intended solely for educational purposes. While we strive to provide accurate, evidence-based content, this is not medical advice and should never replace consultation with healthcare professionals. Science evolves constantly, and individual health circumstances vary widely. Please consult qualified healthcare professionals for specific health concerns, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.